Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 84
Filtrar
1.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 100(1): 34-45, Ene. 2024. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-230772

RESUMO

El Calendario de Inmunizaciones de la AEP para 2024, con sus recomendaciones de inmunización para embarazadas, niños y adolescentes residentes en España, hace el número 25 desde el primero presentado en 1995, siendo anual desde 2003, como calendario de vacunaciones, y desde 2023 como calendario de inmunizaciones por la inclusión de un anticuerpo monoclonal para la prevención de la enfermedad por VRS. Como novedades de este año, se encuentran las siguientes: • Tabla de inmunizaciones sistemáticas para personas sanas y otra para pertenecientes a grupos de riesgo. • Aunque ya anteriormente se hacían recomendaciones de vacunación en embarazadas, se han añadido a la tabla y se ha creado un apartado específico. • Se recomienda la vacunación frente al neumococo con una de las nuevas vacunas conjugadas de valencia ampliada, en sustitución de VNC13. • Se recomienda la sustitución de la vacuna frente al meningococo C a los 4 meses de edad por la vacuna MenACWY, quedando la pauta recomendada como 1+1+1 (4 meses, 12 meses y 12 años, manteniendo el rescate en adolescentes hasta los 18 años). • Se recomienda la vacuna intranasal frente a gripe como la preferente en mayores de 2 años. • Siguiendo las propuestas de OMS, ECDC y CISNS, la vacunación frente al SARS-CoV-2 pasa a ser recomendada solo para personas mayores de 6 meses con factores de riesgo, con preparados que contengan el linaje XBB.1. Las recomendaciones de vacunación contra la covid en pediatría se actualizarán periódicamente en la web del CAV-AEP.Se mantienen el resto de las recomendaciones del calendario anterior.(AU)


The AEP Immunization Calendar for 2024, with its immunization recommendations for pregnant women, children and adolescents residing in Spain, marks the 25th edition since the first one was introduced in 1995, being annual since 2003, as a vaccination calendar, and since 2023 as immunization schedule due to the inclusion of a monoclonal antibody for the prevention of RSV disease. Novelties for this year include the following: • Tables of systematic immunizations for healthy people and those belonging to risk groups. • Although vaccination recommendations were previously made for pregnant women, they have been now included in the table and a specific section has been created. • Vaccination against pneumococcus is recommended with one of the new expanded valence conjugate vaccines, replacing PCV13. • It is recommended to replace the meningococcus C vaccine at 4 months of age with the MenACWY vaccine, thus leaving the recommended schedule as 1+1+1 (4 months, 12 months and 12 years, with a catch-up for adolescents up to 18 years). • The intranasal flu vaccine is recommended as the preferred vaccine for people over 2 years of age. • Following the proposals of the WHO, ECDC and CISNS, vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is now recommended only for people over 6 months of age with risk factors, using vaccines containing the XBB.1 lineage. Vaccination recommendations against covid in pediatrics will be updated periodically on the CAV-AEP website.The rest of the recommendations from the previous calendar remain unchanged.(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Programas de Imunização , Vacinas , Vacinação , Vacinas contra Influenza , Pediatria , Espanha
2.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 100(1): 34-45, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38220359

RESUMO

The AEP Immunization Calendar for 2024, with its immunization recommendations for pregnant women, children and adolescents residing in Spain, marks the 25th edition since the first one was introduced in 1995, being annual since 2003, as a vaccination calendar, and since 2023 as immunization schedule due to the inclusion of a monoclonal antibody for the prevention of RSV disease. Novelties for this year include the following: The rest of the recommendations from the previous calendar remain unchanged.


Assuntos
Vacinação , Gravidez , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Feminino , Esquemas de Imunização , Espanha
3.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 98(1): 58.e1-58.e10, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36599520

RESUMO

As it does every year, the CAV-AEP publishes the update of its recommendations for the use of vaccines in children, adolescents and pregnant women residing in Spain. The 2 + 1 schedule is maintained in infants (at 2, 4 and 11 months), including preterm infants, with the hexavalent vaccine (DTaP-IPV-Hib-HB) and the pneumococcal 13-valent conjugate vaccine. A booster dose with DTaP-IPV is needed at 6 years for those who received the 2 + 1 series with hexavalent vaccine as infants, in addition to 1 dose of dTap in adolescence. Routine vaccination of pregnant women with a dose of dTap is recommended in each pregnancy, preferably between weeks 27 and 32 of gestation, although can be given from 20 weeks if there is risk of preterm delivery. All infants should receive the rotavirus vaccine (2-3 doses) and the 4CMenB vaccine (2 + 1 series). All children aged 6-59 months should be vaccinated against influenza each year. The MenACWY vaccine should be given routinely at 12 months of age and in adolescence between ages 12 and 18 years. The recommendations for the MMR vaccine (12 months and 3-4 years) and varicella vaccine (15 months and 3-4 years) also remain unchanged, using the MMRV vaccine for the second dose. Recommendations for the use of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the paediatric age group will be updated periodically on the CAV-AEP website. The HPV vaccine is indicated in all adolescents, regardless of sex, at age 12 years. Novelties include the recommendation of routine administration of nirsevimab to neonates and infants aged less than 6 months for passive immunization against RSV, and the recommendations regarding the hexavalent vaccine are consolidated in a single section.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções Meningocócicas , Vacinas Meningocócicas , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Gravidez , Lactente , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Feminino , Esquemas de Imunização , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinas Bacterianas , Vacinas Combinadas
4.
Infect Dis Ther ; 12(1): 157-175, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36367677

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Immunization is the most effective strategy for the prevention of invasive meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MenB); however, parents need to weigh the risk-benefit and financial impact of immunizing their children against MenB in the absence of a national immunization program (NIP). This study aimed to explore societal preferences (of parents and pediatricians) regarding the attributes of a MenB vaccine in Spain. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) based on cross-sectional surveys was carried out to determine preferences. A literature review and scientific committee determined the six attributes related to the MenB vaccine included in the DCE: vaccination age, cost, duration, percentage of protection, adverse events probability, and expert/authority recommendation. Data were analyzed using a mixed logit model. Relative importance (RI) of attributes was calculated and compared between parents and pediatricians. RESULTS: A total of 278 parents [55.8% female, mean age 40.4 (standard deviation, SD 7.3) years] and 200 pediatricians [73.0% female, mean age 45.8 (SD 12.9) years] answered the DCE. For parents, the highest RI was attributed to vaccine cost, expert/authority recommendation, and percentage of protection (26.4%, 26.1%, and 22.9%, respectively), while for pediatricians the highest RI was assigned to percentage of protection, expert/authority recommendation, and vaccination age (27.2%, 23.7%, and 22.6%, respectively). Significant differences between parents and pediatricians were found in the RI assigned to all attributes (p < 0.001), except for vaccine recommendation. CONCLUSION: In the decision regarding MenB vaccination, cost was a driver in parental decision-making but had a low RI for pediatricians and, conversely, vaccination age was highly valued by pediatricians but was the attribute with least importance for parents. Despite these differences, expert/authority recommendation and percentage of protection were essential criteria for both groups. These results provide relevant information about MenB vaccination, highlighting the importance of considering societal preferences for NIP inclusion.

5.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(5): 2046961, 2022 11 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35435807

RESUMO

Rotavirus (RV) is the most common cause of severe gastroenteritis (GE) in infants and young children worldwide and is associated with a significant clinical and economic burden. The objective of this study was to analyze the characteristics, healthcare resource utilization and the direct medical costs related to RVGE hospitalizations in Spain. An observational, multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2013 to May 2018 at the pediatric departments of 12 hospitals from different Spanish regions. Children under 5 years of age admitted to the hospital with a confirmed diagnosis of RVGE were selected. Data on clinical characteristics, healthcare resource use and costs were collected from patient records and hospital databases. Most children hospitalized for RVGE did not have any previous medical condition or chronic disease. Forty-seven percent had previously visited the Emergency Room (ER), 27% had visited a primary care pediatrician, and 15% had received pharmacological treatment prior to hospital admission due to an RVGE episode. The average length of a hospital stay for RVGE was 5.6 days, and the mean medical costs of RVGE hospitalizations per episode ranged from 3,940€ to 4,100€. The highest direct medical cost was due to the hospital stay. This study showed a high burden of health resource utilization and costs related to the management of cases of RVGE requiring hospitalization. RV vaccination with high coverage rates should be considered to minimize the clinical and economic impacts of this disease on the health-care system.


Assuntos
Infecções por Rotavirus , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Rotavirus , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Hospitalização , Humanos , Lactente , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Infecções por Rotavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/terapia , Espanha/epidemiologia
6.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 96(1): 59.e1-59.e10, 2022 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34998730

RESUMO

After reviewing the best available scientific information, CAV-AEP publishes their new recommendations to protect pregnant women, children and adolescents living in Spain through vaccination. The same recommendations as the previous year regarding hexavalent vaccines, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine of 13 serotypes, booster with tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis and inactivated poliomyelitis (Tdpa-IPV) at 6 years and with tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis (Tdpa) at 12-14 years and pregnant women from week 27 (from week 20 if there is a high risk of preterm delivery). Also with rotavirus, tetraantigenic meningococcal B (2+1), meningococcal quadrivalent (MenACWY), MMR, varicella and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, for both genders. As novelties this year the CAV-AEP recommends: Influenza vaccination from 6 to 59 months of age whenever feasible and does not harm the vaccination program aimed at people at higher risk. According to official national recommendations, the CAV-AEP recommends the systematic use of COVID mRNA vaccines since 5 years old.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas de mRNA , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Esquemas de Imunização , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Gravidez , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
7.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 96(1): 59-59, ene 2022. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-202798

RESUMO

Tras la revisión de la mejor información científica disponible, el CAV-AEP publica las nuevas recomendaciones para proteger con vacunas a las embarazadas, los niños y los adolescentes residentes en España. Se mantienen las mismas recomendaciones que el año anterior en cuanto a las vacunas hexavalentes y a la vacuna neumocócica conjugada de 13 serotipos, al refuerzo con tétanos, difteria, tosferina y poliomielitis inactivada (Tdpa-VPI) a los seis años y con tétanos, difteria y tosferina (Tdpa) a los 12-14 años y a las embarazadas a partir de la semana 27 (desde la semana 20 si hay alto riesgo de parto pretérmino). Lo mismo sucede con las vacunas del rotavirus, del meningococo B tetraantigénica (2 + 1), de la vacuna meningocócica tetravalente (MenACWY), de la triple vírica, de la varicela y de la vacuna del virus del papiloma humano (VPH), en ambos géneros.Como novedades este año el CAV-AEP recomienda: La vacunación antigripal de seis a 59 meses de edad siempre que sea factible y no perjudique al programa vacunal dirigido a las personas de mayor riesgo. En consonancia con las recomendaciones oficiales nacionales, el CAV-AEP recomienda el uso sistemático a partir de los 5 años de las vacunas para la COVID-19 de ARNm. (AU)


After reviewing the best available scientific information, CAV-AEP publishes their new recommendations to protect pregnant women, children and adolescents living in Spain through vaccination. The same recommendations as the previous year regarding hexavalent vaccines, pneumococcal conjugate vaccine of 13 serotypes, booster with tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis and inactivated poliomyelitis (Tdpa-IPV) at 6 years and with tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis (Tdpa) at 12–14 years and pregnant women from week 27 (from week 20 if there is a high risk of preterm delivery). Also with rotavirus, tetraantigenic meningococcal B (2+1), meningococcal quadrivalent (MenACWY), MMR, varicella and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines, for both genders. As novelties this year the CAV-AEP recommends: Influenza vaccination from 6 to 59 months of age whenever feasible and does not harm the vaccination program aimed at people at higher risk. According to official national recommendations, the CAV-AEP recommends the systematic use of COVID mRNA vaccines since 5 years old. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Criança , Adolescente , Programas de Imunização , Pediatria , Publicações Científicas e Técnicas , Espanha
8.
Front Immunol ; 12: 671755, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34447369

RESUMO

Primary immune regulatory disorders (PIRD) are associated with autoimmunity, autoinflammation and/or dysregulation of lymphocyte homeostasis. Autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) is a PIRD due to an apoptotic defect in Fas-FasL pathway and characterized by benign and chronic lymphoproliferation, autoimmunity and increased risk of lymphoma. Clinical manifestations and typical laboratory biomarkers of ALPS have also been found in patients with a gene defect out of the Fas-FasL pathway (ALPS-like disorders). Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA), we identified more than 600 patients suffering from 24 distinct genetic defects described in the literature with an autoimmune lymphoproliferative phenotype (ALPS-like syndromes) corresponding to phenocopies of primary immunodeficiency (PID) (NRAS, KRAS), susceptibility to EBV (MAGT1, PRKCD, XIAP, SH2D1A, RASGRP1, TNFRSF9), antibody deficiency (PIK3CD gain of function (GOF), PIK3R1 loss of function (LOF), CARD11 GOF), regulatory T-cells defects (CTLA4, LRBA, STAT3 GOF, IL2RA, IL2RB, DEF6), combined immunodeficiencies (ITK, STK4), defects in intrinsic and innate immunity and predisposition to infection (STAT1 GOF, IL12RB1) and autoimmunity/autoinflammation (ADA2, TNFAIP3,TPP2, TET2). CTLA4 and LRBA patients correspond around to 50% of total ALPS-like cases. However, only 100% of CTLA4, PRKCD, TET2 and NRAS/KRAS reported patients had an ALPS-like presentation, while the autoimmunity and lymphoproliferation combination resulted rare in other genetic defects. Recurrent infections, skin lesions, enteropathy and malignancy are the most common clinical manifestations. Some approaches available for the immunological study and identification of ALPS-like patients through flow cytometry and ALPS biomarkers are provided in this work. Protein expression assays for NKG2D, XIAP, SAP, CTLA4 and LRBA deficiencies and functional studies of AKT, STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation, are showed as useful tests. Patients suspected to suffer from one of these disorders require rapid and correct diagnosis allowing initiation of tailored specific therapeutic strategies and monitoring thereby improving the prognosis and their quality of life.


Assuntos
Síndrome Linfoproliferativa Autoimune/diagnóstico , Síndrome Linfoproliferativa Autoimune/imunologia , Síndrome Linfoproliferativa Autoimune/terapia , Doenças da Imunodeficiência Primária/diagnóstico , Doenças da Imunodeficiência Primária/imunologia , Doenças da Imunodeficiência Primária/terapia , Diagnóstico Precoce , Humanos
9.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 94(1): 53.e1-53.e10, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33419517

RESUMO

The CAV-AEP annually publishes the immunisation schedule considered optimal for all children and adolescent resident in Spain, taking into account the available evidence. The 2+1 schedule is recommended (2, 4, and 11 months) with hexavalent vaccines (DTPa-VPI-Hib-HB) and with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate.A 6-year booster is recommended, preferably with DTPa (if available), with a dose of polio for those who received 2+1 schemes, as well as vaccination with Tdpa in adolescents and in each pregnancy, preferably between 27 and 32 weeks. Rotavirus vaccine should be systematic for all infants. Meningococcal B vaccine, with a 2+1 schedule, should be included in routine calendar. In addition to the inclusion of the conjugated tetravalent meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY) at 12 years of age with catch up to 18 years, inclusive, the CAV recommends this vaccine to be also included at 12 months of age, replacing MenC. Likewise, it is recommended in those over 6 weeks of age with risk factors or who travel to countries with a high incidence of these serogroups. Two-dose schedules for triple viral (12 months and 3-4 years) and varicella (15 months and 3-4 years) will be used. The second dose could be applied as a tetraviral vaccine. Universal systematic vaccination against HPV is recommended, regardless of gender, preferably at 12 years, and greater effort should be made to improve coverage. The 9 genotype extends coverage for both genders.


Assuntos
Esquemas de Imunização , Vacinação , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Espanha , Vacinas Combinadas
10.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 94(1): 53.e1-53.e10, ene. 2021. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-200280

RESUMO

El CAV-AEP publica anualmente el calendario de vacunaciones que estima idóneo para los niños y adolescentes residentes en España, teniendo en cuenta la evidencia científica disponible. Se mantiene el esquema 2 + 1 (2, 4 y 11 meses) con vacunas hexavalentes (DTPa-VPI-Hib-HB) y con antineumocócica conjugada 13-valente. Se aconseja un refuerzo a los 6 años, preferentemente con DTPa (si está disponible), junto a una dosis de polio para aquellos que recibieron esquemas 2 + 1, así como vacunación con Tdpa en adolescentes y en cada embarazo, preferentemente entre las 27 y 32 semanas. La vacuna del rotavirus debería ser sistemática para todos los lactantes. Se insiste en la incorporación en el calendario de la vacuna antimeningocócica B, con esquema 2 + 1 en lactantes. Además de la inclusión de la vacuna antimeningocócica conjugada tetravalente (MenACWY) a los 12 años con rescate hasta 18 años, inclusive, el CAV-AEP recomienda que esta vacuna sea introducida también a los 12 meses de edad, sustituyendo a MenC. Igualmente, se recomienda en los mayores de 6 semanas de edad con factores de riesgo o que viajen a países de elevada incidencia de estos serogrupos. Se emplearán esquemas de dos dosis para triple vírica (12 meses y 3-4 años) y varicela (15 meses y 3-4 años). La segunda dosis se podría aplicar como vacuna tetravírica. Se recomienda la vacunación sistemática universal frente al VPH, con independencia del género, preferentemente a los 12 años, insistiendo en un mayor esfuerzo para mejorar las coberturas. La de 9 genotipos amplía la cobertura para ambos sexos


The CAV-AEP annually publishes the immunisation schedule considered optimal for all children and adolescent resident in Spain, taking into account the available evidence. The 2 + 1 schedule is recommended (2, 4, and 11 months) with hexavalent vaccines (DTPa-VPI-Hib-HB) and with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate.A 6-year booster is recommended, preferably with DTPa (if available), with a dose of polio for those who received 2 + 1 schemes, as well as vaccination with Tdpa in adolescents and in each pregnancy, preferably between 27 and 32 weeks. Rotavirus vaccine should be systematic for all infants. Meningococcal B vaccine, with a 2 + 1 schedule, should be included in routine calendar. In addition to the inclusion of the conjugated tetravalent meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY) at 12 years of age with catch up to 18 years, inclusive, the CAV recommends this vaccine to be also included at 12 months of age, replacing MenC. Likewise, it is recommended in those over 6 weeks of age with risk factors or who travel to countries with a high incidence of these serogroups. Two-dose schedules for triple viral (12 months and 3-4 years) and varicella (15 months and 3-4 years) will be used. The second dose could be applied as a tetraviral vaccine. Universal systematic vaccination against HPV is recommended, regardless of gender, preferably at 12 years, and greater effort should be made to improve coverage. The 9 genotype extends coverage for both genders


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Vacinas Bacterianas/administração & dosagem , Esquemas de Imunização , Sociedades Médicas , Pediatria , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Espanha
12.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 39(11): 1050-1056, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32773658

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the leading cause of congenital infection worldwide. Up to 15%-20% of infected newborns will develop long-term sequelae such as hearing loss and neurologic abnormalities. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of congenital CMV infection (cCMV) and associated clinical abnormalities in Spain. METHODS: A prospective screening for cCMV by viral load in saliva was performed. Saliva samples were obtained within the first 72 hours of life in a maternity ward in Madrid (Spain), during a 1-year period. All positive screening tests were confirmed with viral load in urine. Clinical, laboratory, auditory, visual and cerebral imaging assessments were performed in all children with cCMV. RESULTS: Of the 4097 neonates born during the study period, 3190 (78%) were included. CMV viral load in saliva was detectable in 24/3190 (0.75%) children, and congenital infection was confirmed in 15/3190 (0.47%, CI 95%: 0.29%-0.77%). Positive predictive value was 62.5% (CI 95%: 46.5%-76.1%). Two infants presented symptoms at birth. Eight (53.3%) children showed abnormalities in magnetic resonance imaging; most of them isolated white matter abnormalities. Newborns with abnormalities in magnetic resonance imaging showed higher viral loads in blood and saliva (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: One in 200 neonates born in our hospital presented a cCMV infection. CMV viral load in saliva has been shown to be a simple and highly accepted screening method but should be confirmed by CMV detection in urine. In spite of the fact that half of infected children had abnormalities in cerebral imaging, diagnosis during the neonatal period would have been impossible without a screening program in most cases.


Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus/congênito , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/epidemiologia , Triagem Neonatal , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Saliva/virologia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Urina/virologia , Carga Viral
13.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 92(1): 52.e1-52.e10, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31901289

RESUMO

The CAV-AEP annually publishes the immunisation schedule considered optimal for all children resident in Spain, taking into account the available evidence. The 2+1 schedule is recommended (2, 4, and 11 months) with hexavalent vaccines (DTPa-VPI-Hib-HB) and with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate. A 6-year booster is recommended, preferably with DTPa (if available), with a dose of polio for those who received 2+1 schemes, as well as vaccination with Tdpa in adolescents and in each pregnancy, preferably between 27 and 32 weeks. Rotavirus vaccine should be systematic for all infants. Meningococcal B vaccine, with a 2+1 schedule, should be included in routine calendar. In addition to the inclusion of the conjugated tetravalent meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY) at 12 years of age with catch up to 18 years, inclusive, the CAV recommends this vaccine to be also included at 12 months of age, replacing MenC. Likewise, it is recommended in those over 6 weeks of age with risk factors or who travel to countries with a high incidence of these serogroups. Two-dose schedules for MMR (12 months and 3-4 years) and varicella (15 months and 3-4 years) will be used. The second dose could be applied as a tetraviral vaccine. Universal systematic vaccination against HPV is recommended, both for girls and boys, preferably at 12 years, and greater effort should be made to improve coverage. The 9 genotype extends coverage for both genders.


Assuntos
Vacinas Bacterianas/administração & dosagem , Esquemas de Imunização , Pediatria , Sociedades Médicas , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Espanha
14.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 92(1): 52.e1-52.e10, ene. 2020. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-186820

RESUMO

El CAV-AEP publica anualmente el calendario de vacunaciones que estima idóneo para los niños residentes en España, teniendo en cuenta la evidencia científica disponible. Se mantiene el esquema 2 + 1 (2, 4 y 11 meses) con vacunas hexavalentes (DTPa-VPI-Hib-HB) y con antineumocócica conjugada 13-valente. Se aconseja un refuerzo a los 6 años, preferentemente con DTPa (si está disponible), junto a una dosis de polio para aquellos que recibieron esquemas 2 + 1, así como vacunación con Tdpa en adolescentes y en cada embarazo, preferentemente entre las 27 y las 32 semanas. La vacuna del rotavirus debería ser sistemática para todos los lactantes. Se sigue proponiendo la incorporación en el calendario de la vacuna antimeningocócica B, con esquema 2 + 1 en lactantes. Además de la inclusión de la vacuna antimeningocócica conjugada tetravalente (MenACWY) a los 12 años con rescate hasta los 18 años, inclusive, el CAV recomienda que esta vacuna sea introducida también a los 12 meses de edad, sustituyendo a MenC. Igualmente, se recomienda en los mayores de 6 semanas de edad con factores de riesgo o que viajen a países de elevada incidencia de estos serogrupos. Se emplearán esquemas de 2 dosis para triple vírica (12 meses y 3-4 años) y varicela (15 meses y 3-4 años). La segunda dosis se podría aplicar como vacuna tetravírica. Se recomienda la vacunación sistemática universal frente al VPH, tanto a chicas como a chicos, preferentemente a los 12 años, debiendo realizar un mayor esfuerzo para mejorar las coberturas. La de 9 genotipos amplía la cobertura para ambos sexos


The CAV-AEP annually publishes the immunisation schedule considered optimal for all children resident in Spain, taking into account the available evidence. The 2 + 1 schedule is recommended (2, 4, and 11 months) with hexavalent vaccines (DTPa-VPI-Hib-HB) and with 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate. A 6-year booster is recommended, preferably with DTPa (if available), with a dose of polio for those who received 2 + 1 schemes, as well as vaccination with Tdpa in adolescents and in each pregnancy, preferably between 27 and 32 weeks. Rotavirus vaccine should be systematic for all infants. Meningococcal B vaccine, with a 2+1 schedule, should be included in routine calendar. In addition to the inclusion of the conjugated tetravalent meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY) at 12 years of age with catch up to 18 years, inclusive, the CAV recommends this vaccine to be also included at 12 months of age, replacing MenC. Likewise, it is recommended in those over 6 weeks of age with risk factors or who travel to countries with a high incidence of these serogroups. Two-dose schedules for MMR (12 months and 3-4 years) and varicella (15 months and 3-4 years) will be used. The second dose could be applied as a tetraviral vaccine. Universal systematic vaccination against HPV is recommended, both for girls and boys, preferably at 12 years, and greater effort should be made to improve coverage. The 9 genotype extends coverage for both genders


Assuntos
Humanos , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Criança , Adolescente , Programas de Imunização/normas , Consórcios de Saúde , Programas de Imunização/métodos , Imunização Secundária/tendências , Vacinas/imunologia , Espanha
17.
Rev. esp. quimioter ; 32(5): 410-425, oct. 2019. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-188707

RESUMO

Due to the rise in the number and types of immunosuppressed patients, invasive fungal infections (IFI) are an increasing and major cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised adults and children. There is a broad group of pediatric patients at risk for IFI in whom primary and/or secondary antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) should be considered despite scant evidence. Pediatric groups at risk for IFI includes extremely premature infants in some settings, while in high-risk children with cancer receiving chemotherapy or undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT), AFP against yeast and moulds is usually recommended. For solid organ transplanted, children, prophylaxis depends on the type of transplant and associated risk factors. In children with primary or acquired immunodeficiency such as HIV or long-term immunosuppressive treatment, AFP depends on the type of immunodeficiency and the degree of immunosuppression. Chronic granulomatous disease is associated with a particular high-risk of IFI and anti-mould prophylaxis is always indicated. In contrast, AFP is not generally recommended in children with long stay in intensive care units. The choice of AFP is limited by the approval of antifungal agents in different age groups and by their pharmacokinetics characteristics. This document aims to review current available information on AFP in children and to provide a comprehensive proposal for each type of patient


Las infecciones fúngicas invasoras (IFI) constituyen un problema creciente en adultos y niños inmunodeprimidos, acompañándose de una elevada morbimortalidad. El número de niños inmunodeprimidos va en aumento. Los grupos de riesgo de IFI en pediatría incluyen a los grandes prematuros, que se benefician de profilaxis con fluconazol, pacientes hemato-oncológicos sometidos a quimioterapia o trasplante de precursores hematopoyéticos con neutropenias prolongadas, en quienes la profilaxis frente a hongos filamentosos suele recomendarse en situaciones de alto riesgo. En niños sometidos a trasplante de órgano sólido, la profilaxis depende del tipo de trasplante y factores de riesgo asociados. En pacientes con inmunodeficiencias primarias o adquiridas como la infección VIH o tratamiento inmunosupresor prolongado, la profilaxis antifúngica dependerá del tipo de inmunodeficiencia primaria y del grado de inmunosupresión. La enfermedad granulomatosa crónica tiene riesgo particularmente elevado de IFI y requiere siempre profilaxis frente a hongos filamentosos. En cambio, en niños con ingresos prolongados en cuidados intensivos la profilaxis frente a IFI habitualmente no está indicada. El tipo de profilaxis está limitado por la diferente aprobación de antifúngicos a distintas edades. Este documento pretende revisar la información actual disponible respecto a profilaxis antifúngica en niños, con propuesta para la estrategia más apropiada en cada tipo de paciente


Assuntos
Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Criança , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/prevenção & controle , Prevenção Primária/métodos , Prevenção Secundária/métodos , Candidíase/prevenção & controle , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos adversos , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/complicações , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica , Lactente Extremamente Prematuro , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , Transplantados
18.
Vaccine ; 37(16): 2200-2207, 2019 04 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30902478

RESUMO

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Using the data from the HERACLES clinical surveillance study (2007-2016), we describe the population impact of the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PVC13) on invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) in children <15 years of age in the Community of Madrid, Spain. After six years of the inclusion of PCV13 in the vaccination calendar (2010-2016), and despite changes in the Regional Immunization Programme that limited its availability, the net benefit incidence rate (IR) of IPD fell by 70.1% (IRR 0.3 [95% CI: 0.22-0.4]; p ≤ 0.001), mainly due to a significant reduction (91%) in the PCV13 serotypes (IRR 0.09 [95% CI: 0.05-0.16], p ≤ 0.001). Furthermore, no significant changes were detected in the IR of IPD caused by non-PCV13 serotypes. The IRs of the aggressive, resistant and most prevalent serotype in the analysed population, the 19A serotype, dramatically decreased from the beginning to the end of the study (98%) [IRR 0.03 (95% CI: 0.00-0.19), p ≤ 0.001], to its almost total disappearance. Remarkably, this reduction led to a pronounced decline in the percentage of cefotaxime-resistant isolates and the incidence of meningitis cases. Assessment of the clinical impact revealed a reduction in the number of all clinical presentations of IPD, confirming the effectiveness of the PCV13. Finally, PCV13 detected by PCR is predicted to have a stronger impact than the one based on culture methods, which can overlook more than 20% of cases of IPD, mainly pleural empyemas.


Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/imunologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/imunologia , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Feminino , Vacina Pneumocócica Conjugada Heptavalente/imunologia , História do Século XXI , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Masculino , Infecções Pneumocócicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Pneumocócicas/história , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vigilância em Saúde Pública , Sorogrupo , Espanha/epidemiologia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/classificação , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efeitos dos fármacos
19.
An. pediatr. (2003. Ed. impr.) ; 90(2): 86-93, feb. 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-177219

RESUMO

Introducción: La información existente sobre el impacto de la gripe en la población infantil española es escasa. El presente trabajo pretende aumentar este conocimiento estudiando aspectos clave como la incidencia de hospitalización, clínica, comorbilidades y el estado vacunal en los niños hospitalizados. Métodos: Estudio retrospectivo, observacional, por revisión de historias clínicas, en menores de 15 años hospitalizados por gripe adquirida en la comunidad, confirmada microbiológicamente, durante 2 temporadas gripales (2014-2015 y 2015-2016). El estudio se realizó en 10 hospitales de 6 ciudades, que atienden aproximadamente al 12% de la población infantil española. Resultados: Fueron hospitalizados 907 niños con diagnóstico principal de gripe (447 < 2 años), con una tasa media anual de incidencia de hospitalización de 0,51 casos/1.000 niños (IC del 95% 0,48-0,55). El 45% presentó enfermedades subyacentes consideradas factores de riesgo para gripe grave, y la mayor parte de ellos (74%) no habían sido vacunados. El porcentaje con enfermedades subyacentes aumentó con la edad, desde el 26% en menores de 6 meses al 74% en mayores de 10 años. El 10% de los casos (n = 92) precisaron cuidados intensivos pediátricos por fallo respiratorio agudo. Conclusión: La gripe es causa importante de hospitalización en la población infantil española. Los menores de 6 meses de edad y los niños con enfermedades subyacentes constituyen una parte mayoritaria (> 50%) de los casos. Una gran parte de las formas graves de gripe en población infantil podrían ser evitada si se cumplieran las indicaciones actuales de vacunación


Introduction: There are only a limited number of studies on the impact of influenza in the Spanish child population. The present work intends to increase this knowledge by studying some key aspects, such as the incidence of hospital admissions, clinic variables, comorbidities, and the vaccination status in the hospitalised children. Methods: A retrospective, observational study was conducted by reviewing the medical records of children under 15 years and hospitalised due to community acquired influenza confirmed microbiologically, during 2́ flu seasons (2014-2015 and 2015-2016). The study was carried out in 10 hospitals of 6cities, which represent approximately 12% of the Spanish child population. Results: A total of 907 children were admitted to hospital with main diagnosis of influenza infection (447 < 2 years), estimating an average annual rate of hospitalisation incidence of 0.51 cases / 1,000 children (95% CI; 0.48-0.55). Just under half (45%) of the cases had an underlying disease considered a risk factor for severe influenza, and most (74%) had not been vaccinated. The percentage of children with underlying diseases increased with age, from 26% in children < 6 months to 74% in children >10 years. Admission to the PICU was required in 10% (92) of the cases, mainly due to acute respiratory failure. Conclusion: Influenza continues to be an important cause of hospitalisation in the Spanish child population. Children < 6 months of age and children with underlying diseases make up the majority (> 50%) of the cases. Many of the severe forms of childhood influenza that occur today could be avoided if current vaccination guidelines were met


Assuntos
Humanos , Criança , Hospitalização , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/microbiologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Espanha/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudo Observacional , Doença Crônica , Oxigenoterapia , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem
20.
An Pediatr (Engl Ed) ; 90(1): 56.e1-56.e9, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30609975

RESUMO

The Advisory Committee on Vaccines of the Spanish Association of Paediatrics annually publishes the immunisation schedule considered optimal for children resident in Spain, according to available evidence on current vaccines. As regards funded immunisations, the 2+1 strategy (2, 4, 11 months) with hexavalent (DTPa-IPV-Hib-HB) and 13-valent pneumococcal vaccines are recommended. Administration of the 6-year booster dose with DTPa is recommended, with a poliomyelitis dose for children who had received the 2+1 scheme, as well as Tdap vaccine for adolescents and pregnant women in every pregnancy between 27 and 32 weeks gestation. The 2-dose scheme should be used for MMR (12 months and 3-4 years) and varicella (15 months and 3-4 years). MMRV vaccine could be applied as the second dose. Vaccination against HPV is recommended in both genders, preferably at 12 years of age. A stronger effort should be made to improve vaccination coverage. The new 9-valent vaccine is now available, expanding the coverage for both genders. Tetravalent meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY) is recommended at 12 months and 12-14 years, with a catch-up up at 19 years of age. It is also recommended in infants older than 6 weeks of age with risk factors, or travellers to countries with high incidence of ACWY meningococcal serogroups. As regards non-funded immunisations, it is recommended meningococcal B vaccination, with a 2+1 schedule, and requests that it be included in the National Immunisation Program. Vaccination against rotavirus is recommended in all infants.


Assuntos
Esquemas de Imunização , Criança , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...